The relationship between perceived mutuality and attitudes of sexism, racism, and heterosexism : searching for a common factor

Cardinal Scholar

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Alexander, Charlene M. en_US
dc.contributor.author Heineman, Carolyn J. en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2011-06-03T19:26:36Z
dc.date.available 2011-06-03T19:26:36Z
dc.date.created 2003 en_US
dc.date.issued 2003
dc.identifier LD2489.Z68 2003 .H45 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://cardinalscholar.bsu.edu/handle/handle/176709
dc.description.abstract Relational/Cultural theory (aka Stone Center Theory; Jordan, Kaplan, Miller, Stiver, & Surrey, 1991) has suggested that mutuality is a bidirectional interpersonal process in which both parties hold empathic consideration for the other, value and encourage the differentness of the other, and have the ability and willingness to impact and be impacted by the other. Separately, attitudes of sexism, racism, and heterosexism have been defined as involving interpersonal attitudes and interaction that are distinctly defined by a lack of empathic consideration, the devaluing of difference and an unwillingness to be impacted. This seemingly inverse relationship leads to speculation about how the absence of mutuality may be an underlying requirement to the maintenance of sexism, racism, and heterosexism.Canonical correlation was used to identify the simple and compound relationships between two predictor variables (mutuality) and six criterion variables (social attitudes). The mutuality variables were assessed using the Mutual Psychological Development Questionnaire (Genero, Miller, & Surrey, 1992), and the attitude variables were assessed using the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (Glick & Fiske, 1996), the Pro-Black/Anti-Black scale (Katz & Hass, 1988), and the Attitudes Towards Lesbians and Gay Men scale (Herek, 1988). Participants were 310 White, heterosexual, women and men undergraduate students at a large midwestern university.A pattern of perceived mutuality in relationships was identified and was found to be related to a mixed pattern of prejudicial attitudes. The expression of perceived mutuality in two types of relationships formed a unipolar pattern. A bipolar pattern of attitudes was characterized by (a) less prejudice towards Blacks, (b) less sympathy towards the condition of Blacks, (c) less prejudice towards gay men, (d) greater sexism towards women, and (e) greater prejudice towards lesbians.Gender roles and values-based Ambivalent Racism Theory (Katz & Hass, 1988) were used to explain the results. The study upheld previous research findings that women express less prejudicial attitudes than do men, and that those who express negative attitudes toward one out-group tend to express negative attitudes towards multiple targets.The results indicate that there is sufficient evidence to retain the concept of a mutual relational orientation as a necessary but insufficient underlying dynamic across multiple forms of oppression.College of Architecture en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Department of Counseling Psychology and Guidance Services
dc.format.extent ii, 134 leaves ; 28 cm. en_US
dc.source Virtual Press en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Sexism. en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Racism. en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Heterosexism. en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Empathy. en_US
dc.title The relationship between perceived mutuality and attitudes of sexism, racism, and heterosexism : searching for a common factor en_US
dc.description.degree Thesis (Ph. D.) en_US
dc.identifier.cardcat-url http://liblink.bsu.edu/catkey/1263892 en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Doctoral Dissertations [3121]
    Doctoral dissertations submitted to the Graduate School by Ball State University doctoral candidates in partial fulfillment of degree requirements.

Show simple item record

Search Cardinal Scholar


Browse

My Account