Constitutional misinterpretation in Dred Scott v. Sanford : an honors thesis ([HONRS] 499)

Cardinal Scholar

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Baker, Ralph, 1942- en_US
dc.contributor.author Sorensen, Rivka en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2011-06-06T19:25:07Z
dc.date.available 2011-06-06T19:25:07Z
dc.date.created 1992 en_US
dc.date.issued 1992
dc.identifier.other A-123 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://cardinalscholar.bsu.edu/handle/handle/192646
dc.description.abstract This thesis is an examination of one of the worst decisions made in the history of the Supreme Court, the decision in Dred Scott v. Sanford. First, the background of the case and its antecedents are described. Second, an analysis of the arguments that led to the disastrous decision are presented. Finally, it is demonstrated how the decision in this case is based on misinterpretations of the Constitution.
dc.description.sponsorship Honors College
dc.format.extent 1 v. ; 28 cm. en_US
dc.source Virtual Press en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Criminology. en_US
dc.title Constitutional misinterpretation in Dred Scott v. Sanford : an honors thesis ([HONRS] 499) en_US
dc.type Undergraduate senior honors thesis.
dc.description.degree Thesis (B.?.)
dc.identifier.cardcat-url http://liblink.bsu.edu/catkey/1246382 en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Undergraduate Honors Theses [5614]
    Honors theses submitted to the Honors College by Ball State University undergraduate students in partial fulfillment of degree requirements.

Show simple item record

Search Cardinal Scholar


Browse

My Account