GIS and the prehistoric landscape : an examination of applicability

Cardinal Scholar

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Wilson, Matthew W.
dc.contributor.author Hollon, Debra K.
dc.date.accessioned 2011-07-07T15:58:39Z
dc.date.available 2011-07-08T05:30:04Z
dc.date.created 2011-05-07
dc.date.issued 2011-05-07
dc.identifier.uri http://cardinalscholar.bsu.edu/handle/123456789/194747
dc.description.abstract Mobility is not just a synonym for movement. It is the combination of movement and the situation, meaning, and context in which that movement takes place. One way that geographers can examine mobility and its context, including mobility in contexts of the past, is through the use of geographic information systems (GIS). A historical GIS incorporates data from historical sources to combine spatial, attribute, and temporal information to visualize spatial patterns as well as see how those patterns change over time. But what if the time period under study is prior to a written language or other documentation? Is a GIS applicable for an examination of a prehistoric landscape? One method employed to visualize spatial patterns of movement is a least cost analysis which can be used to study migration, trade, transportation, or rituals. A case study of the exchange network of the Middle Mississippian center of Cahokia was conducted to test applicability of using GIS on a prehistoric landscape. Input locations included archaeological sites where objects or structures associated with Cahokia (such as platform mounds and certain types of pottery and chert hoes) have been found as well as possible source locations for exotic objects found at Cahokia (such as copper and a certain type of clay). An examination of the least cost paths at varying scales revealed some problems at larger scales including vector/raster mismatches and gaps between datasets. Even though this type of analysis would not typically be used at larger scales, the problems and the root causes of those problems could possibly impact any analysis at any scale. An understanding of the limitations involved with using a GIS to examine a prehistoric landscape (data availability/accuracy, processing requirements, etc.) as well as the scope of any individual project will dictate whether GIS is applicable for that project.
dc.description.sponsorship Department of Geography
dc.description.tableofcontents Introduction -- Literature review -- Case study : Middle Mississippian exchange : background -- Case study : Middle Mississippian exchange : model -- Case study : Middle Mississippian exchange : results -- Discussion -- Conclusion.
dc.subject.lcsh Commerce, Prehistoric -- Costs -- Geographic information systems -- Middle West -- Case studies.
dc.subject.lcsh Mississippian culture -- Geographic information systems -- Middle West -- Case studies.
dc.subject.lcsh Indians of North America -- Geographic information systems -- Middle West -- Antiquities -- Case studies.
dc.subject.lcsh Middle West -- Geographic information systems -- Antiquities -- Case studies.
dc.subject.other Cahokia Mounds State Historic Park (Ill.)
dc.title GIS and the prehistoric landscape : an examination of applicability en_US
dc.title.alternative Geographic information systems and the prehistoric landscape
dc.description.degree Thesis (M.S.)
dc.date.liftdate 2011-07-08
dc.identifier.cardcat-url http://liblink.bsu.edu/catkey/1640181


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Master's Theses [5417]
    Master's theses submitted to the Graduate School by Ball State University master's degree candidates in partial fulfillment of degree requirements.

Show simple item record

Search Cardinal Scholar


Browse

My Account