From question to conclusion : the effect of statistical analysis choice

Cardinal Scholar

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Ritchey, Kristin A.
dc.contributor.author Higdon, Lindsay G.
dc.date.accessioned 2011-07-12T17:09:41Z
dc.date.available 2011-07-13T05:30:06Z
dc.date.created 2011-05-07
dc.date.issued 2011-05-07
dc.identifier.uri http://cardinalscholar.bsu.edu/handle/123456789/194817
dc.description.abstract Many people assume that as long as the data are collected well and the results are significant, reliable, and valid, then the original research question was answered. The problem with this assumption is that a data set can yield different results and conclusions depending on the type of hypotheses that are made and the statistical analyses that are chosen. This paper provides a demonstration of what can happen when the same data set is analyzed using different statistical methods (ANOVA, Regression, and MANOVA). Slightly different results were obtained that led to different conclusions about the variables in question.
dc.description.sponsorship Department of Psychological Science
dc.subject.lcsh Analysis of variance.
dc.subject.lcsh Regression analysis.
dc.subject.lcsh Multivariate analysis.
dc.subject.lcsh Statistics -- Methodology.
dc.subject.lcsh Music -- Psychological aspects.
dc.title From question to conclusion : the effect of statistical analysis choice en_US
dc.title.alternative Question to conclusion
dc.type Research paper (M.A.), 3 hrs.
dc.description.degree Thesis (M.A.) en_US
dc.date.liftdate 2011-07-13
dc.identifier.cardcat-url http://liblink.bsu.edu/catkey/1651118


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Research Papers [5068]
    Research papers submitted to the Graduate School by Ball State University master's degree candidates in partial fulfillment of degree requirements.

Show simple item record

Search Cardinal Scholar


Browse

My Account