Abstract:
This paper investigates the development situation of Chinese art districts that are a
continuation of urban memory. The research identifies certain fundamental characteristics that
profile three art districts in China: Shanghai Tianzifang Art District, Beijing 798 Art District, and
Xi’an Textile Town Art District. The case studies were conducted to: 1) identify the formation
factors of art districts, 2) explore how the old buildings are adaptively reused for art and cultural
purposes, and 3) analyze the reasons for the gentrification in art districts. In China, governments
have used art districts as a political tool for promoting tourism, increasing real estate value,
emphasizing creative economy, and enhancing the city's image. Usually, Chinese art districts
have a bottom-up development process and then government management takes over. Thus, it is
difficult to balance the commercial real estate value with cultural value. For an art district’s longterm
prospects, all levels of society should give more consideration to attentive care for the
“ecological environment” in art, instead of unduly emphasized economic development.
Government should lead people to protect cultural resources and foster commitment to culture
development responsibility, rather than profit-oriented man-made "culture and landscape."