dc.description.abstract |
Urban parks have existed for hundreds of years, providing people in cities with a
means of escape from their busy lives. Urban parks bring economic, ecological, and
social benefits to the city, and can act as a catalyst for rejuvenating a neighborhood.
When coupled with other parks in close proximity, urban parks begin to create a network
that brings these benefits to the entire city; however, most urban parks are often isolated,
limiting the impact of their benefits. The question becomes how to place urban parks in a
city to bring the benefits they provide to the population that needs them most.
This research examines the components of urban park networks, factoring
economic, ecological, and social benefits; through a spatial lens using the spatial logic
approach to park planning in a city, a methodology presented in Dr. Emily Talen’s paper
“The Spatial Logic of Parks.” While this methodology uses descriptive methods of
evaluating a city for park placement and planning based on social need, it does not take
into consideration social desire – society’s desire for urban parks in their community.
The intention of this research was to discover if the use of a public opinion survey on the
existing parks in South Bend, Indiana can be harnessed as a next step to the spatial logic
approach, and provide a means of prioritizing the results based on social desire.
Using Talen’s methodology, survey data, and the GIS analysis technique of multicriteria
evaluation on South Bend, Indiana, the conclusion of this thesis defines a set of
guidelines using greatest need and social desire to make parks and their benefits
available to the maximum number of residents in a city. |
en_US |