Abstract:
This dissertation examines contradictions in discourses regarding women and expected
forms of female emotional expression in William Shakespeare’s As You Like It (1599) and
Anthony and Cleopatra (1606), Elizabeth Cary’s The Tragedy of Mariam (1613), and George
Chapman’s The Widow’s Tears (1605). I draw on emotions history as a part of a cultural
study of early modern drama; this new approach benefits literary criticism by creating a
dialog between historical understandings of women's emotional expressions and current
critical conversations about early modern gender constructs and hierarchies. This project
considers four key questions: 1) How do essentialized views of emotional expression help
to define and regulate what it means to be a man or woman within a society that is
struggling with single-sex and two-sex models? 2) What stereotypes about women emerge
from gendered views of emotional expression? 3) How does drama reinforce or redefine
“feeling rules” for women? 4) What are the consequences for characters who conform to or
defy gender expectations, and how does an awareness of emotional expectations allow
them to navigate gender relationships and/or disrupt gender hierarchies? In answering
these questions, I offer three contributions. At the most basic level, I document complex understandings of early modern emotional expressions and their relationship with the
material body. I bring together conversations about “leaky” female bodies and anxieties
about feigning femininity to highlight the problems with dominant feeling rules that
attempt to contain women. Finally, I demonstrate a crucial need for individuals to navigate
cultural expectations of emotional expression within their respective emotional
communities. These plays, with their disruption of gender hierarchies and their
relationship to real women’s experiences, reveal that emotional expression is a site of
struggle; characters that fail to navigate gendered expectations of emotion are punished,
while characters that acknowledge the demands of emotional communities often find ways
to work within the system. Such work creates a more encompassing understanding of how
emotions were represented on the stage, in print, and in everyday life.
