dc.description.abstract |
Members of stigmatized social groups routinely encounter situations where they fear their
behavior will confirm negative stereotypes associated with their social identity (Steele &
Aronson, 1995). A plethora of empirical research has demonstrated this apprehension – known
as stereotype threat – activates behavioral, cognitive, and emotional reactions that adversely
impact performance (Nguyen & Ryan, 2008; Schmader, Johns, & Forbes, 2008; Spencer, Logel,
& Davies, 2016). Efforts to identify methods of protecting the performance of stigmatized
individuals have demonstrated that allowing individuals to reflect on important personal
characteristics prior to a performance event (i.e., self-affirmation) can effectively eliminate the
debilitative influence of stereotype threat on performance. However, little is known regarding the
mechanisms that contribute to the protective benefits of self-affirmation exercises (McQueen &
Kline, 2006). The current research focuses on the influence of self-affirmation on the most
proximal mediator of the stereotype threat and performance relationship, working memory
effectiveness.
For this study participants were randomly assigned to one of four experimental conditions
(no self-affirmation & low stereotype threat, no self-affirmation & high stereotype threat, self-
affirmation & low stereotype threat, and self-affirmation & high stereotype threat). Participants
in each condition completed two working memory measures (i.e., operation span task, Foster et
al., 2014; letter-memory task; Morris & Jones, 1990) and a series of high-working memory
demand modular arithmetic problems (Beilock, Rydell, & McConnell, 2007). Results indicated
engaging in the process of self-affirmation was associated with increased mathematical
performance when modular arithmetic problems were completed in the absence of stereotype
threat-inducing cues. However, results demonstrated engaging in the process of self-affirmation
was associated with reductions in mathematical performance when modular arithmetic problems
were completed in the presence of stereotype threat activating cues. Finally, results indicated
there were no differences on the working memory measure among participants assigned to the
four experimental conditions. |
|