Prophylactic and functional ankle braces affects on motor skills

Cardinal Scholar

Cardinal Scholar is under a temporary content freeze while we migrate to a new repository platform. This freeze will continue through 06/05/2023.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Curless, Brian D. en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2011-06-03T19:30:01Z
dc.date.available 2011-06-03T19:30:01Z
dc.date.created 1989 en_US
dc.date.issued 1989
dc.identifier LD2489.Z9 1989 .C87 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://cardinalscholar.bsu.edu/handle/handle/179675
dc.description.abstract In athletics the ankle is one of the most commonly injured body parts. Athletic trainers have used a woven cloth with an adhesive backing to restrict the motion of an injured ankle. This practice was generally accepted in the profession as the best way to guard against reinjury. During the recent years athletic tape has become very expensive and questioned by many researchers as to it's effectiveness.At present many ankle braces have been introduced to the market as a viable alternative to taping the ankle. Most of the research limited to an analysis of range of motion provided by the ankle braces.The purpose of this study was to determine what effects ankle braces (Cramer Ankle Stabilizer, Peter's Active Ankle Brace, and the Air Cast) have on athletes in motor skills: Illinois Agility Test and standing long jump.The results of this study provides information on whether or not the use of prophylactic ankle braces has a detrimental effect on motor skills. Twenty Eariham College athletes between the ages of seventeen and twenty-two were recruited for this study. Subjects were asked to wear each one of the devices and perform each of the two motor skills tests. Ample time was allowed for each athlete to become familiar with ankle braces. The order of experimental conditions and measures were counter balanced to prevent order of effects.Each event was either timed to the nearest 1/10th or the nearest centimeter. Each subject performed the dependent variables without any ankle restriction which served as the control group.The investigation of the data concluded that no statistical difference was found after completing a one way analysis of variance.The only conclusion that was found that the participants were slowest in the agility run with the Peter's Active Ankle. The opposite was found in the standing long jump where subjects jumped furthest with the Peter's brace. This was thought to be true due to the increased ability to plantar- and dorsi- flex the ankle. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship School of Physical Education
dc.format.extent ii, 40 leaves : ill. ; 28 cm. en_US
dc.source Virtual Press en_US
dc.title Prophylactic and functional ankle braces affects on motor skills en_US
dc.type Research paper (M.A.), 3 hrs. en_US
dc.description.degree Thesis (M.A.) en_US
dc.identifier.cardcat-url http://liblink.bsu.edu/catkey/562774 en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Research Papers [5100]
    Research papers submitted to the Graduate School by Ball State University master's degree candidates in partial fulfillment of degree requirements.

Show simple item record

Search Cardinal Scholar


Browse

My Account