Planning procedures and leadership role of the principal in professional development schools

Cardinal Scholar

Cardinal Scholar is under a temporary content freeze while we migrate to a new repository platform. This freeze will continue through 06/20/2023.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Kowalski, Theodore J. en_US Pritchett, Duncan N. P. en_US 2011-06-03T19:30:07Z 2011-06-03T19:30:07Z 1999 en_US 1999
dc.identifier LD2489.Z64 1999 .P75 en_US
dc.description.abstract This study was designed to determine (a) the nature and extent of planning and programmatic changes that occurred in Indiana schools that have incorporated the Ball State University (BSU) Professional Development School (PDS) model; (b) how the implementation of these changes had impacted the school principal's roles and responsibilities; (c) whether the principal serving as site coordinator effected the school or principal's work; and (d) whether geographic classification effected process or outcomes. Interviews were conducted with the principal, site coordinators and teachers during March 1999. Findings:1.The principals, teachers, and university faculty were continuously involved in planning.2.Although the duration of planning varied, all schools used planning committees, research and multiple planning processes.3.The most notable changes were instructional modifications and collaborative teaching.4.Half of the principals (two urban and one suburban) became more facilitative and more inclined to use shared decision making.5.Half of the schools had a change in the principalship during planning; one school had four different principals during this period.6.Site coordinators had a positive influence on shared decision making.7.More change occurred in the urban schools. Conclusions:1. Ongoing communication and shared decision making helped diminish possible negative consequences of principal turnover during planning.2.Differences in planning duration and frequency did not appear to affect outcomes.3.Transition to a PDS had more effects on the urban schools, suggesting that climates and cultures in suburban schools were initially more congruous with the PDS philosophy.4.The philosophy of the PDS requires a collaborative leadership style on the part of the principal. Those unwilling to assume this role are likely to withdraw from the principalship. Having the principal not serve as the site coordinator promotes collaboration and shared authority.5.Suburban educators were inclined to view PDS issues politically, while the urban educators were inclined to view them economically.Recommendations:1. The leadership style of a principal should be a primary consideration in selecting possible PDS sites.2.Longitudinal studies of PDSs should be conducted in the areas of student academic growth, curriculum, and faculty satisfaction. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Department of Educational Leadership
dc.format.extent x, 168 leaves ; 28 cm. en_US
dc.source Virtual Press en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Laboratory schools -- Indiana -- Planning. en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Laboratory schools -- Indiana -- Administration. en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Laboratory schools -- Indiana -- Faculty. en_US
dc.subject.other Ball State University. Office of Professional Laboratory Experiences. en_US
dc.title Planning procedures and leadership role of the principal in professional development schools en_US Thesis (D. Ed.) en_US
dc.identifier.cardcat-url en_US

Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Doctoral Dissertations [3300]
    Doctoral dissertations submitted to the Graduate School by Ball State University doctoral candidates in partial fulfillment of degree requirements.

Show simple item record

Search Cardinal Scholar


My Account