NLRB policy on deferral to arbitration under the Collyer Doctrine : an honors thesis ([HONRS] 499)

Cardinal Scholar

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Deitsch, Clarence R. en_US
dc.contributor.author Baade, Kim M. en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2011-06-06T18:24:27Z
dc.date.available 2011-06-06T18:24:27Z
dc.date.created 1983 en_US
dc.date.issued 1983
dc.identifier.other A-41 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://cardinalscholar.bsu.edu/handle/handle/189335
dc.description.abstract The purpose of this paper is to explore the possibilities of the Collyer decision and find support for my belief that the current nature of NLRB deferral to arbitration saddles the union with the burden of forcing employers to adhere to the collective bargaining agreement and encourages behavior which, prior to Collyer, would have been treated as un unfair labor practice and remedied by the NLRB.
dc.description.sponsorship Honors College
dc.format.extent 23 leaves ; 28 cm. en_US
dc.source Virtual Press en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Business. en_US
dc.title NLRB policy on deferral to arbitration under the Collyer Doctrine : an honors thesis ([HONRS] 499) en_US
dc.type Undergraduate senior honors thesis
dc.description.degree Thesis (B.?)
dc.identifier.cardcat-url http://liblink.bsu.edu/catkey/1249686 en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Undergraduate Honors Theses [5928]
    Honors theses submitted to the Honors College by Ball State University undergraduate students in partial fulfillment of degree requirements.

Show simple item record

Search Cardinal Scholar


Browse

My Account